No problem at all.
Just a shame it didn’t work.
I don’t immediately see where the problem could be,
but if you can indeed find an alternative solution via command line, that might be the easiest.
Thanks again for visiting my site,
and I hope to see you here again.
Sincerely,
Marc.

LikeLike

Thank you very much for your answer and care! The LUT was cube anyway, the input I changed from PNG to JPG. Unfortunately, the result is still not much better, see here: https://imgur.com/vuhkXwo

I think I will just look for something simpler, like a Linux command-line solution (I think imagemagick could do it) and write a script myself to do the bulk job.

LikeLiked by 1 person

Dear Binjomin Szanto-Varnagy,
First of all, thank you for visiting my humble website.
Then, the problem with the Bulk Luts Previewer.
I looked at your result on Imgur, the photo was on the small side, and I couldn’t quite see which file links are made on the left side of the program – I do see “PNG” to apply the preview to.
The photo on Imgur does show color differences in the different outputs – my opinion is that the program cannot properly apply the LUT to the test photo, below are the possible causes:
1) the test photo to be used must – as far as I remember – be a jpg/jpeg format – not PNG !
2) the LUT must be of the format: cube, 3dl, dat, m3d
I hope I was able to help you with this – if it works, please drop me a line!
Best Regards,
Marc.

LikeLike

All LUTs look the same, very strange.

LikeLike

LikeLike